Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS)

Most recent data: March 31 2025

51% of reviews mention negative culture (higher than 99% of companies)
Culture has been stable over the past two years

―
Most frequent negative cultural indicators
• Toxic culture: 24% of reviews (higher than 99% of companies)
• Bullying: 24% of reviews (higher than 99% of companies)
• Organisational dysfunction: 15% of reviews (higher than 99% of companies)
Reviews mentioning negative culture over time
20222023202420250%20%40%60%80%
Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS)All companiesAll companies in healthcare sectorAll companies in government and public administration sector% reviews
Reviews mentioning negative culture
• 3.5x overall average
• 2.5x healthcare sector average
• 3.5x government and public administration sector average
With 59 total reviews, we can confidently identify small differences
Reviews mentioning negative cultural indicators
Toxic cultureBullyingOrganisational dysfunctionInequity and discriminationPoor leadershipOverwork and stressInstability and high turnover0%5%10%15%20%
Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS)All companiesAll companies in healthcare sectorAll companies in government and public administration sector% reviews
Most common terms in pros and cons
Overall rating vs negative culture in healthcare sector
Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) vs other companies in sector
2.533.5410%20%30%40%50%
Average overall rating% reviews mentioning negative culture
Overall rating vs negative culture in government and public administration sector
Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) vs other companies in sector
2.533.5410%20%30%40%50%
Average overall rating% reviews mentioning negative culture